A first-mover mobile wellness network launched 77 new markets with effective media.

The Challenge
Being first to market in mobile wellness created opportunity, but also operational complexity at scale. The client built a network of medical professionals delivering home IV therapy, aesthetic treatments, and ancillary health services across a growing geography.
But the model's strength was also its media planning challenge. Each partner brought different budgets, different service mixes, and different capacity constraints. Centralizing media strategy across this fragmented network while balancing local operators required both technical infrastructure and organizational alignment.
The urgency was competitive. As the category pioneer, the window to dominate new markets before competitors arrived was finite. Geographic expansion targets were aggressive and each new market required its own launch strategy, creative approach, and demand calibration. Moving too slowly meant ceding first-mover advantage; moving too fast meant overwhelming partner capacity or misallocating spend.
Two additional constraints compounded the complexity. Service routing required near-daily media adjustments based on real-time booking availability by location. And product line launches in restricted pharmaceutical and health service categories demanded specialized creative that converted without violating platform policy or making non-compliant health claims. The prior agency had been underperforming on both paid search and paid social, with fragmented measurement making the true picture difficult to assess.
The Strategic Insight
The diagnosis was structural before it was tactical. The strategy managed media on multiple accounts, independently. Structurally, this was going to inneficient to scale en masse.
A model with independent affiliates, corporate and localized budgets needed to function more like a cooperative. Operating in parallel, accounting for variable service availability by location, and a restricted-category product portfolio required a purpose-built media architecture.
The strategic reframe: treat every location as a distinct demand unit operating within a unified brand and measurement framework. Corporate-level media would build brand awareness and category authority across all markets simultaneously; location-level media would drive immediate demand calibrated to each affiliate's capacity and service mix. The two tiers needed coordination rather than independence, which required centralized planning authority and shared measurement infrastructure.
The second insight was on baseline performance. The prior measurement was fragmented without unified attribution, no lead quality signals, no feedback loops between demand generated and capacity consumed. Rebuilding measurement from the ground up would reveal the true performance gap and create the feedback architecture needed to close it systematically.
The Execution
The media strategy operated on two simultaneous tracks. Corporate-level campaigns built brand awareness and category authority across all markets, establishing the brand as the definitive mobile wellness provider in each geography. Below that, location-level campaigns functioned as independent demand units with its own daily budget, targeting parameters, and capacity inputs informed by real-time service availability data.
Service routing integration was the operational differentiator. Each location's daily booking status fed directly into media planning decisions: spend ramped when locations had open capacity, and pulled back when schedules were full. This prevented the failure mode of driving leads to locations that couldn't fulfill them, protecting partner satisfaction and conversion efficiency simultaneously.
Paid search launched first. Month one ROAS increased 54% vs. the prior agency. Paid social launched in month two, bringing combined blended ROAS up 44%. The media architecture sustained 77+ location launches over 18 months, each with a dedicated launch strategy calibrated to that market's competitive landscape and partner capacity.
Creative strategy had to operate at two levels: brand campaigns building awareness and authority across all markets, and market-level campaigns tailored to each location's specific service mix and audience. The co-op structure meant creative couldn't be uniform. Llocal operators needed market-specific assets that still laddered up to a unified brand narrative.
Restricted pharmaceutical and health service categories required dedicated creative development with strict compliance review. Product line launches in regulated spaces (like IV therapy formulations, aesthetic treatments, wellness protocols) required creative that converted without triggering platform policy violations or making non-compliant health claims.
Each new geo launch received a dedicated creative build: market entry assets establishing the brand, service-specific creative for the offerings available at that location, and retargeting creative for conversion. All without compressing creative quality or compliance rigor.
Fragmented measurement infrastructure was the first problem to solve. A unified attribution framework was built spanning both paid search and paid social, with lead routing by location to correctly assign demand to the affiliate generating it, and appointment conversion signals fed back into campaign bidding.
Lead quality measurement was built into the system from the start. Raw lead volume was a misleading metric in this model. A lead routed to a location at capacity, or for a service that location didn't offer, was effectively worthless. Quality signals like appointment booking rate and conversion value were incorporated into performance reporting and eventually into bidding optimization.
Conversion optimization ran alongside measurement infrastructure. Landing page testing and form funnel optimization targeted every stage of the conversion path, identifying friction points and systematically eliminating them. The combined measurement and conversion program produced a 227% revenue increase in the first 60 days and created the feedback loops that sustained profitable growth.
Client Testimonial
Neon increased our revenue by 227% in the first 60 days.
The Results
The engagement delivered across all four dimensions: ROAS, revenue growth, location expansion, and operational infrastructure.
In month one, paid search ROAS increased 54% vs. the prior agency. This delivered the immediate proof point needed to expand the engagement. Paid social launched in month two, and combined blended ROAS increased 44% vs. prior benchmarks. Within 60 days, revenue had grown 227%. This was a 3X increase, representing the fastest revenue ramp in the client's history.
Over 18 months, the location expansion program scaled from 3 to 80+ markets. Seventy-seven new locations, each with its own media launch strategy, creative build, and demand calibration. The co-op media architecture handled this growth without requiring proportional headcount increases, making the model genuinely scalable rather than operationally dependent on manual management.
Measurement infrastructure built during the engagement created sustained advantages beyond the initial ROAS improvements. Lead routing accuracy, appointment conversion tracking, and service-capacity signals became embedded in daily planning decisions. A compounding feedback loop improved efficiency as the network grew. The client entered each new market with a replicable launch playbook, a unified measurement framework, and a media architecture purpose-built for co-op scale.
Case study Summary
Want results like these? Let's talk about your brand's potential.
Book a call →Key Takeaways
Frequently Asked Questions
Bring your growth target and your biggest roadblocks. We'll show you where the next gains are.
Talk to a Partner →Related Results